Copeland XWEB & XWEB Pro Under Security Scrutiny
Industrial control systems (ICS) face escalating threats as a cluster of critical vulnerabilities in Copeland’s XWEB and XWEB Pro devices has triggered urgent warnings from the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA).
Released on February 26, 2026, under Alert Code ICSA-26-057-10, the advisory highlights 23 flaws affecting versions up to 1.12.1 of XWEB 300D PRO, XWEB 500D PRO, and XWEB 500B PRO.
These web-based supervisors, used globally in refrigeration, HVAC, and building automation for commercial facilities, carry a CVSS v3 base score of 10, signaling maximum severity.
Successful exploitation could enable attackers to bypass authentication, trigger denial-of-service (DoS) conditions, corrupt memory, and execute arbitrary code, potentially compromising entire ICS networks.
The vulnerabilities span multiple CWE categories, including OS command injection (CWE-78), path traversal (CWE-22), stack-based buffer overflows, broken cryptography (CWE-327), and unexpected status code handling (CWE-394).
No public exploits are known yet, but the pre-authentication nature of some flaws amplifies the risk to internet-exposed devices.
Technical Breakdown of Key Vulnerabilities
At the forefront is CVE-2026-25085, an authentication bypass stemming from improper handling of unexpected return values in the authentication routine. An unauthenticated attacker with network access can submit crafted requests to trick the system into granting access without credentials.
This grants entry to sensitive management interfaces, enabling data theft or further exploitation. CVSS metrics underscore high confidentiality impact, with low effects on integrity and availability.
CVE-2026-23702 exemplifies OS command injection risks, where manipulation of the “Username” field in the API V1 import preconfiguration route allows authenticated users to inject shell commands.
Vulnerable up to version 1.12.1, this flaw demands elevated privileges but leads to remote code execution (RCE), overwriting system files, or deploying malware. Similarly, CVE-2026-20764 targets the Configuration Handler’s “Hostname” parameter to enable command injection by exploiting poor input sanitization.
Path traversal in CVE-2026-22877 (CWE-22) permits unauthenticated file reads by abusing directory traversal sequences such as “../” on unspecified endpoints.
Attackers could extract configuration files, credentials, or proprietary ICS logic, facilitating lateral movement. Buffer overflows, such as those in CVE-2026-24663 and CVE-2026-21389, arise from stack-based issues in input processing, enabling memory corruption and potential RCE via controlled payloads. Weak cryptography across CVEs such as CVE-2026-25195 relies on deprecated algorithms, undermining data protection.​
Impact on Critical Infrastructure
Deployed worldwide from Copeland’s U.S. headquarters, these devices underpin commercial refrigeration and HVAC systems in sectors such as food processing and data centers. A compromised XWEB could disrupt cooling systems, leading to spoilage, equipment damage, or cascading failures in building automation.
The advisory notes no targeted exploitation to CISA, but ICS exposure remains a prime vector for nation-state actors and ransomware groups.​
Vendor and Mitigation Strategies
Copeland has acknowledged the issues via advisories on webapps.copeland.com, urging upgrades beyond 1.12.1 where patches address input validation, authentication logic, and memory safeguards.
CISA endorses defense-in-depth: isolate ICS networks behind firewalls, restrict internet access, and enforce VPNs for remote management. Monitor API routes for anomalies, conduct risk assessments, and apply least-privilege access. Additional resources include CISA’s ICS-TIP-12-146-01B for intrusion detection.​
Organizations should scan their environments withtools like Nmap to identifyexposed XWEB ports (typically 80/443) and audit configurations. Claroty’s disclosure emphasizes proactive patching, as high-complexity exploits still pose stealthy threats in air-gapped setups via supply-chain vectors.
Broader Implications for ICS Security
This incident underscores persistent ICS woes: legacy codebases, embedded web servers, and slow patching cycles. With 23 CVEs in one advisory, it rivals past hauls like Log4Shell, pressuring vendors to prioritize secure-by-design principles. Experts anticipate shadow variants in similar controllers from competitors.
As threats evolve, CISA’s KEV catalog and coordinated vulnerability disclosure (CVD) will be pivotal. Users must balance operational continuity with security, perhaps segmenting legacy XWEBs until firmware matures.
| CVE ID | Description Category | Key Details (from Advisory and Sources) vuldb+2 |
|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-25085 | Unexpected Status Code/Return Value | Authentication bypass via improper handling; high confidentiality impact (CVSS 8.6 equivalent noted). ​ |
| CVE-2026-21718 | Critical flaw (unspecified in summary) | CVSS 10.0; affects XWEB Pro authentication pathways.​ |
| CVE-2026-24663 | Stack-based Buffer Overflow | Input processing overflow leads to memory corruption/RCE. ​ |
| CVE-2026-21389 | Stack-based Buffer Overflow | Similar stack overflow in processing endpoints.​ |
| CVE-2026-25111 | Broken/Risky Cryptographic Algorithm | Deprecated crypto undermines data protection. ​ |
| CVE-2026-20742 | OS Command Injection | Poor input sanitization in config handlers. ​ |
| CVE-2026-24517 | Path Traversal | Directory traversal for unauthorized file access. ​ |
| CVE-2026-25195 | OS Command Injection | Firmware update input validation flaw (CWE-78).​ |
| CVE-2026-20910 | Buffer Overflow | Stack-based memory corruption vulnerability. ​ |
| CVE-2026-24689 | Authentication Bypass/OS Command Injection | Combined pre-auth risks in API routes.​ |
| CVE-2026-25109 | Path Traversal | Exploits pathname limitations (CWE-22). ​ |
| CVE-2026-20902 | Broken Cryptography | Risky algorithm use in security features.​ |
| CVE-2026-24695 | Stack-based Buffer Overflow | Overflow in unspecified handlers.​ |
| CVE-2026-25105 | OS Command Injection | Command execution via crafted inputs.​ |
| CVE-2026-24452 | OS Command Injection | Template File Handler manipulation (CWE-78). ​ |
| CVE-2026-23702 | OS Command Injection | “Username” field in API V1 import route.​ |
| CVE-2026-25721 | Buffer Overflow | Memory corruption potential.​ |
| CVE-2026-20764 | OS Command Injection | “Hostname” parameter in config handler. ​ |
| CVE-2026-25196 | Path Traversal | Restricted directory bypass. ​ |
| CVE-2026-25037 | Unexpected Return Value | Logic flaw aiding bypass/DoS. ​ |
| CVE-2026-22877 | Path Traversal (CWE-22) | Unauthenticated file reads via “../” sequences. ​ |
| CVE-2026-20797 | Stack-based Buffer Overflow | API route causes program termination (CVSS 4.3). |
| CVE-2026-3037 | Broken Cryptography/OS Command Injection | Multi-issue crypto/command flaw. ​ |
Site: cybersecuritypath.com